Balancing pump efficiency with=20
NPSH
19 August=20
2008
Selecting a pump is a balance of many factors, including =
the=20
volumes and contents to be pumped, the efficiency of the pumps and =
how=20
frequently the pump will be run.
Where=20
space is at a premium or the cost of changing structures or =
pipework=20
prohibitive, then engineers may also have to deal with an =
additional=20
factor, a lack of suction static head. Not taking the suction =
static head=20
into account fully can cause catastrophic cavitation to occur in =
the pump.=20
Oliver Brigginshaw, managing director of Amarinth, a =
company=20
specialising in the design, application and manufacture of pumps =
and=20
associated equipment, explains NPSH and how pumps can be cost =
effectively=20
engineered to operate in a low NPSH environment.
Cavitation =
occurs=20
when the pump cannot get enough liquid and the resulting reduction =
in=20
pressure causes liquid to vaporise and form bubbles. These bubbles =
can=20
grow dramatically and choke an inlet, further reducing the flow of =
liquid=20
and the performance of the pump. In addition, these bubbles can =
implode=20
with tremendous force, literally tearing away at the metal. The =
resulting=20
increase in vibration and noise can lead to premature component=20
replacement and in some cases complete failure of =
impellers.
To=20
avoid this catastrophic situation, the pump manufacturer should =
always ask=20
you for the Net Positive Suction Head available at the pump - =
NPSH(A) -=20
and ensure this exceeds that required by the pump to operate =
without=20
cavitation occurring =E2=80=93 what is known as NPSH(R). See Fig=20
1.
NPSH=20
(A) is in principle a straightforward calculation, taking into =
account the=20
suction static head, friction losses, atmospheric pressure and the =
vapour=20
pressure of the liquid. However, caution must be exercised with =
the latter=20
parameter, as in an industrial process the liquid may be a =
cocktail of=20
chemicals and so the vapour pressure may need to be determined=20
experimentally. Also, does the static head change during the =
process of=20
pumping the liquid, for example during the emptying of a=20
vessel?
For a given NPSH(A), the pump manufacturer will =
provide a=20
pump with an NPSH(R) less than NPSH(A) by some 0.5m, though if the =
accuracy of the data is circumspect (such as pumping a cocktail of =
fluids), then it may be better to increase this=20
difference.
Generally pump manufacturers design their pumps =
to work=20
at maximum efficiency and hence the lowest running costs. =
Efficiency is=20
related to pump speed and so the speed is fixed to deliver the =
maximum=20
efficiency for a given pump. These parameters dictate the NPSH(R) =
for any=20
given pump.
Important as efficiency is in a pump though, it =
is not=20
the only criteria when selecting the most cost-effective pump for =
the job.=20
Achieving the necessary static head to run a pump at its optimum=20
efficiency may be either impossible to achieve or could involve =
costly=20
changes to plant structure, pipe work and associated equipment. If =
faced=20
with this situation, what are the alternatives?
Computer=20
modelling techniques have better enabled us to understand fluid =
dynamics=20
and how we can design a pump to run efficiently in a low NPSH =
environment.=20
However, many of the pumps sold today have designs that date back =
50 years=20
and their manufacturers often have neither the desire, skills, nor =
wish to=20
make the investment in new patterns to deliver a low NPSH=20
alternative.
This means that if you require a low NPSH pump =
then=20
you need to turn to one of the specialist pump companies such as =
Amarinth.=20
Using sophisticated tools and techniques they can =
=E2=80=98tune=E2=80=99 existing=20
designs and re-engineer key components to produce pumps capable of =
delivering the required performance within the NPSH constraints of =
the=20
plant. They also have comprehensive test facilities, as finding =
the point=20
of cavitation reliably is a crucial, but largely empirical,=20
process.
The resulting pump will be one that can deliver =
the=20
specified performance within the suction static head constraints =
at an=20
efficiency approaching that of a standard pump. The cost of =
undertaking=20
these modifications is of course not cheap, but it is almost =
always=20
outweighed by the cost or sheer impracticability of modifying the =
plant=20
structure.
A=20
good example of a low NPSH application where there was no option =
to create=20
the necessary static head can be found on a Floating, Production, =
Storage=20
and Offloading (FPSO) vessel. Wood Group, a global market leader =
in=20
deepwater engineering, was working with Amerada Hess on a =
sophisticated=20
filtration system that would enable their Triton FPSO vessel =
located in=20
the North Sea to meet the pending OSPAR regulations. The project =
demanded=20
ten high specification pumps to pump the produced water. These had =
to have=20
a small enough footprint so that they could squeeze within the =
tight space=20
constraints of the Triton vessel and the restriction of existing =
headroom=20
so that pumps would have to operate in a very low NPSH (A) =
environment,=20
leaving them prone to cavitation.
Initially a =
=E2=80=98vertical in-line=20
pump=E2=80=99 was considered but this was quickly ruled out as it =
required=20
significant headroom to remove the motors during maintenance, =
which was=20
not available. Additional pipework before and after the pump would =
also=20
have been required, expanding the footprint beyond the space=20
available.
To achieve the dimensional space constraints =
within the=20
tight contract deadline, a completely new pump design was not =
feasible and=20
so Amarinth proposed a hybrid design. This was based on its proven =
=E2=80=98C=E2=80=99=20
series heavy duty ISO 5199 chemical pump. This =
=E2=80=98horizontal=E2=80=99 pump would fit=20
the space constraints and was already suited to operating in low =
NPSH=20
environments.
Up-rated API 610 bearing brackets were =
designed and=20
incorporated which would allow the pump to meet the demands of the =
application, both in terms of the space available and the NPSH =
constraints=20
of the vessel, thus achieving Wood Group=E2=80=99s requirements of =
low=20
maintenance, high reliability pumps that required low NPSH(R). The =
alternative would have been to redesign the system and pipework or =
at=20
worst build new decks to deliver the NPSH (A) that a standard high =
efficiency pump would require for normal =
operation.
Contact=20
Details and Archive...
Related=20
Articles...
Most=20
Viewed Articles...
|



|